Blockchain has made enormous promises to transform finance, but regulatory challenges keep legacy frictions alive. When the SEC and FINRA first attempted to apply old custody and customer protection rules to digital assets, they were left wrestling with questions never envisioned by 20th-century lawmakers. Now, as more investors demand secure and compliant ways to hold crypto, regulators and innovators find themselves in a tug-of-war over how to classify and protect digital assets.
Custody, it turns out, is a knotty business. Should holding a digital asset key count as holding a security? When is a wallet provider a bank, a broker-dealer, or something entirely new? States like New York have added extra layers, requiring the BitLicense and limited trust charters, while national authorities attempt to fit blockchain’s round peg into square rulebooks. The result: businesses must navigate a patchwork of definitions, exemptions, and compliance burdens, often on a state-by-state basis.
The big takeaway: digital asset innovation and institutional adoption won’t truly accelerate until regulators crack the code on custody – by either rewriting the rules or adapting existing frameworks to fit the blockchain era.
To read the full Chapter 3 from GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2024, please click here.